Soil acidity has become a major constraint that threatens sustainable agricultural production in highlands of Ethiopia. Liming has been used as a soil amendments, to ameliorate the acidity problem, albeit it was challenging to apply recommended amount at once for small holder farmers due to inadequate availability, high cost, and poor infrastructure for lime transportation to the required agricultural land area. Hence, to address the problems, a new liming strategy and a precision technique referred to as microdosing, which involves application of small, affordable quantities of lime on an acid soil was evaluated across acid soil prone areas of Ethiopia. The objective of this paper was to summarize and document major research achievements recorded so far on different crops responses to lime micro dosing in acid soil prone areas of Ethiopia. Lime microdosing was evaluated at four lime application rates, including 6.25%, 12.5%, 25% and 33.3% of the recommended lime rate based on exchangeable acidity, which was compared to the traditional lime broadcasting strategy using 100% recommended lime rate in different regions of acid soil prone areas of Ethiopia. Averaged across all of the study, lime microdosing with 25% and 33.3% of recommended lime rate resulted in high yield for major crops (wheat, maize, barley, sorghum, fababean and soybean) in study area which was similar to that of the traditional lime broadcast techniques with a 100% recommended lime rate. Hence, the combined results of the study confirmed a promising positive influence of micro-dosing lime in ameliorating soil acidity and enhancing crop yield which could be suggested as a feasible new liming strategy for smallholder farmers seeking cost-effective and sustainable approaches to elevate agricultural productivity on acid soils. Therefore, micro-dose application of 25% recommended lime based on exchangeable acidity at planting time is the most economically affordable for smallholder farmers to improve soil acidity and increase crop production on acid soils of Ethiopia.
Published in | Engineering Science (Volume 10, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.es.20251001.12 |
Page(s) | 17-23 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Acid Soil, Liming, Micro-Dosing, Smallholder
Treatments | PH | NPPP | BY (t/ha) | GY (kg/ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control (no lime) | 52.22d | 27.40b | 5.20c | 1198b |
6.25% Recommended lime | 55.56cd | 30.00b | 5.46c | 1274b |
12.5% Recommended lime | 56.90bc | 32.60ab | 6.32b | 1303ab |
25.0% Recommended lime | 59.16ab | 34.13ab | 6.93b | 1302ab |
33.3% Recommended lime | 62.49a | 39.067a | 7.69a | 1421a |
LSD (0.05) | 3.45 | 7.014 | 0.65 | 121 |
CV (%) | 3.2 | 11.41 | 5.52 | 4.96 |
Treatments | 2019 | 2020 | Mean |
---|---|---|---|
GY (kg/ha) | GY (kg/ha) | GY (kg/ha) | |
Control (no lime) | 3815.1d | 2980.4c | 3397.7d |
6.25% Recommended lime | 4840.2c | 3359.1c | 4099.6c |
12.5% Recommended lime | 5108.6bc | 4059.2b | 4583.9b |
25.0% Recommended lime | 5377.8b | 4121.8b | 4749.8b |
33.3% Recommended lime | 6392.7a | 5087a | 5739.9a |
LSD (0.05) | 532.71 | 693.76 | 356.65 |
CV (%) | 5.54 | 9.39 | 4.19 |
Treatments | PH (cm) | PL (cm) | NSPP | BY (kg/ha) | GY (kg/ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control (no lime) | 70.04c | 6.53c | 29.26c | 3745.8c | 1187.4c |
6.25% Rec. lime | 74.88bc | 7.18bc | 31.34bc | 4916.7bc | 1619.2bc |
12.5% Rec. lime | 77.76ab | 7.85b | 34.89b | 5404.2ab | 1847.2ab |
25.0% Rec. lime | 79.98a | 9.33a | 43.66a | 6258.3a | 2206.1a |
33.3% Rec. lime | 80.07a | 9.17a | 41.63a | 6312.5a | 2221.5a |
LSD (0.05) | 4.902 | 1.156 | 5.346 | 1266.4 | 514.2 |
CV (%) | 5.4 | 12.1 | 12.4 | 19.9 | 23.7 |
Significance | ** | *** | *** | ** | ** |
Treatments | Grain yield (kg ha-1) | Biomass Yield (kg ha-1) |
---|---|---|
Control | 1836.3e | 6784d |
6.25% of recommended lime | 2454.6d | 8861c |
12.5% of recommended lime | 2906.8c | 9220bc |
25.0% of recommended lime | 3736.2ab | 10317ab |
33.3% of recommended lime | 3924.9a | 10441a |
Full recommended lime | 3637b | 10161ab |
Mean | 3082.6 | 9297.5 |
CV (%) | 13.61 | 20.56 |
LSD (5%) | 239.55 | 1091.9 |
Lime rates | No of seeds per spike | Grain yield (Kg ha-1) | Biomass yield (Kg ha-1) |
---|---|---|---|
Control | 36.4c | 1435.1d | 6142d |
6.25% of recommended lime | 41.9b | 2374.2c | 9097bc |
12.5% of recommended lime | 42.4ab | 2378.1c | 9035c |
25.0% of recommended lime | 46.4a | 2764.6b | 10598a |
33.3% of recommended lime | 43.9ab | 3038.6a | 10121a |
Full recommended lime | 43.4ab | 2920.6ab | 10449a |
Mean | 42.4 | 2485.2 | 9240.3 |
LSD (5%) | 4.3 | 257 | 1051.5 |
CV (%) | 10.6 | 10.8 | 11.9 |
Treatments | No. of pods/ plant | No. of seeds/ pod | GY (kg/ ha) | BY (kg/ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 6.3c | 20.4b | 1640.5c | 5949c |
6.25% of recommended lime | 10.5b | 26.5ab | 2500.6b | 8455b |
12.5% of recommended lime | 11.0ab | 27.1ab | 2422.0b | 8930b |
25.0% of recommended lime | 11.9ab | 30.8a | 3215.3a | 10112a |
33.3% of recommended lime | 12.8a | 30.7a | 3148.2a | 10541a |
Full recommended lime | 11.1ab | 22.9b | 2825.1ab | 9909a |
Mean | 10.6 | 26.4 | 2625.3 | 8982.5 |
CV (%) | 16.15 | 21.9 | 16.12 | 8.58 |
LSD (5%) | 2.1 | 6.9 | 506.8 | 922.7 |
No | Treatments | Soybean | Sorghum | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BY (kg/ha) | GY (Kg/ha) | BY (Kg/ha) | GY (Kg/ha) | ||
1 | Control (No lime) | 2779.6 | 1692.6c | 3364.2 | 2192.6c |
2 | 6.25% Recommended lime | 2831.5 | 1807.4c | 3209.9 | 2407.4c |
3 | 12.5% Recommended lime | 3106.5 | 2268.8b | 3425.9 | 2569.1bc |
4 | 25.0% Recommended lime | 3041.7 | 2272.8b | 3580.2 | 3032.1ab |
5 | 33.3% Recommended lime | 3125 | 2694.6a | 3672.8 | 3337.0a |
LSD | - | 418.23 | - | 568.64 | |
CV | 17.65 | 8.93 | 12.02 | 11.15 | |
Significance | ns | *** | Ns | *** |
BY | Biomass Yield |
GY | Grain Yield |
PH | Plant Height |
PL | Panicle Length |
NSPP | Number of Seed per Plant |
NPPP | Number of Pod per Plant |
[1] | Abreham Y. (2024). Evaluation of Micro-dosing Lime Application on Selected Soil Chemical Properties and Barley Crop Performance at Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia. American Journal of Chemical Engineering; 12(5): 117-122. |
[2] | Anetor O. and E. Akinrinde. (2006). Response of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] to lime and phosphorus fertilizer treatments on an acidic alfisol of Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 5: 286-293. |
[3] | ATA (Agricultural Transformation Agency). (2014). Soil fertility mapping and fertilizer blending. ATA Report, Ethiopia soil information system. Ministry of Agriculture, Addis Ababa. |
[4] | Brady N. C. and R. R. Weil. (2008). The Nature and Properties of Soils. 14th ed. Harlow, England: Pearson Education, Ltd. |
[5] | Dessalegn T., Malefia D., Lijalem A. and Bekele A. (2022). Evaluation of Micro-dose Application of Lime on Soil Chemical Properties and Response of Soybean (Glycine max L.) and Sorghum (sorghum bicolor L.) in Acid Soil Prone Areas of Assosa, Benishangul Gumuz Region, Ethiopia. 349-356. In Results of Natural Resources Management Research 2022. (Ashenafi N., Dawit H., Solomon E., Musefa R., Tesfaye Sh., Reshid A., Sosina A., Dejene A. and Temesgen D. (eds.)) 2022. Proceedings of the Natural Resources Management Completed Research. |
[6] | Getahun D., Geremew T., Musefa R., Yohanis H., Fekadu M. and Derib K. (2022c). Evaluation of Micro-Dosing Lime Application on Selected Soil Chemical Properties and Faba Bean Crop Performance in Acid Soil Prone Areas of Central Ethiopia. J Plant Sci Curr Res 6: 017. |
[7] | Getahun D., Musefa R., Geremew T., Yohanis H., Fekadu M. and Derib K. (2022b). Lime Micro-Dosing Effect on Selected Soil Chemical Properties and Wheat Yield on Soil Acidity Prone Areas of Central Ethiopia. 289-299. In Results of Natural Resources Management Research 2022. (Ashenafi N., Dawit H., Solomon E., Musefa R., Tesfaye Sh., Reshid A., Sosina A., Dejene A. and Temesgen D. (eds.)) 2022. Proceedings of the Natural Resources Management Completed Research. |
[8] | Getahun D., Musefa R., Yohanis H., Geremew T., Derib K. and Fekadu M. (2022a). Evaluation of Lime Micro-Dosing on Selected Soil Physicochemical Properties and Barley Performance on Acid Soils of the Central Highlands, Ethiopia. 300-310. In Results of Natural Resources Management Research 2022. (Ashenafi N., Dawit H., Solomon E., Musefa R., Tesfaye Sh., Reshid A., Sosina A., Dejene A. and Temesgen D. (eds.)) 2022. Proceedings of the Natural Resources Management Completed Research. |
[9] | ICRISAT, - (2009) ICRISAT Archival Report 2008. Documentation. International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India. |
[10] | Kamaruzzaman, M., Mohammad, R., Nurul, I. (2013). Effect of lime on yield contributing characters of Wheat in Barindtract of Bangladesh. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science: 2319-2372. |
[11] | Kisinyo O. (2014). Long term effects of lime and phosphorus application on maize productivity in an acid soil of Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Sky Journal of Agricultural Research, 5: 48-55. |
[12] | Mesfin A. (2007). Nature and management of acid soils in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 99p. |
[13] | Mesfin K. (2022). Effect of Micro-Dose of Lime Application on Bread Wheat Yield and Yield Components on Acidic Soils of Banja District, North Western Ethiopia. 337-348. In Results of Natural Resources Management Research 2022. (Ashenafi N., Dawit H., Solomon E., Musefa R., Tesfaye Sh., Reshid A., Sosina A., Dejene A. and Temesgen D. (eds.)) 2022. Proceedings of the Natural Resources Management Completed Research. |
[14] | Nziguheba, G. (2007). Overcoming phosphorus deficiency in soils of Eastern Africa: recent advances and challenges. Advances in integrated soil fertility management in sub Saharan Africa: challenges and opportunities, pp. 149-160. |
[15] | Sultana, B. S., Mian, M. M., Islam, H., Rahman, M. R., Bikash, M. M., Sarker C. and Zoha M. S. (2009). Effect of liming on soil properties, yield and nutrient uptake by wheat. Current World Environment, 4(1): 39-47. |
[16] | Tolossa Ameyu. (2022). Split Application of Calcium Carbonate for Acid Soil Amelioration, Soybean and Maize Performance in Acid Prone Areas of South Western Ethiopia. American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 7(2): 48-52. |
[17] | Twomlow, S., Rohrbach, D., Dimes, J., Rusike, J., Mupangwa, W., Ncube, B. & Mahposa, P. (2010). Micro-dosing as a pathway to Africa’s Green Revolution: evidence from broad-scale on-farm trials. Nutrient Cycling in Agro-ecosystems, 88(1) 3-15. |
APA Style
Takala, B. (2025). Lime Micro Dosing: A New Liming Strategy for Small Holder Farmers to Increase Crop Production and Productivity in Acid Soil Prone Areas of Ethiopia. Engineering Science, 10(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20251001.12
ACS Style
Takala, B. Lime Micro Dosing: A New Liming Strategy for Small Holder Farmers to Increase Crop Production and Productivity in Acid Soil Prone Areas of Ethiopia. Eng. Sci. 2025, 10(1), 17-23. doi: 10.11648/j.es.20251001.12
AMA Style
Takala B. Lime Micro Dosing: A New Liming Strategy for Small Holder Farmers to Increase Crop Production and Productivity in Acid Soil Prone Areas of Ethiopia. Eng Sci. 2025;10(1):17-23. doi: 10.11648/j.es.20251001.12
@article{10.11648/j.es.20251001.12, author = {Bikila Takala}, title = {Lime Micro Dosing: A New Liming Strategy for Small Holder Farmers to Increase Crop Production and Productivity in Acid Soil Prone Areas of Ethiopia }, journal = {Engineering Science}, volume = {10}, number = {1}, pages = {17-23}, doi = {10.11648/j.es.20251001.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20251001.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.es.20251001.12}, abstract = {Soil acidity has become a major constraint that threatens sustainable agricultural production in highlands of Ethiopia. Liming has been used as a soil amendments, to ameliorate the acidity problem, albeit it was challenging to apply recommended amount at once for small holder farmers due to inadequate availability, high cost, and poor infrastructure for lime transportation to the required agricultural land area. Hence, to address the problems, a new liming strategy and a precision technique referred to as microdosing, which involves application of small, affordable quantities of lime on an acid soil was evaluated across acid soil prone areas of Ethiopia. The objective of this paper was to summarize and document major research achievements recorded so far on different crops responses to lime micro dosing in acid soil prone areas of Ethiopia. Lime microdosing was evaluated at four lime application rates, including 6.25%, 12.5%, 25% and 33.3% of the recommended lime rate based on exchangeable acidity, which was compared to the traditional lime broadcasting strategy using 100% recommended lime rate in different regions of acid soil prone areas of Ethiopia. Averaged across all of the study, lime microdosing with 25% and 33.3% of recommended lime rate resulted in high yield for major crops (wheat, maize, barley, sorghum, fababean and soybean) in study area which was similar to that of the traditional lime broadcast techniques with a 100% recommended lime rate. Hence, the combined results of the study confirmed a promising positive influence of micro-dosing lime in ameliorating soil acidity and enhancing crop yield which could be suggested as a feasible new liming strategy for smallholder farmers seeking cost-effective and sustainable approaches to elevate agricultural productivity on acid soils. Therefore, micro-dose application of 25% recommended lime based on exchangeable acidity at planting time is the most economically affordable for smallholder farmers to improve soil acidity and increase crop production on acid soils of Ethiopia. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Lime Micro Dosing: A New Liming Strategy for Small Holder Farmers to Increase Crop Production and Productivity in Acid Soil Prone Areas of Ethiopia AU - Bikila Takala Y1 - 2025/03/31 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20251001.12 DO - 10.11648/j.es.20251001.12 T2 - Engineering Science JF - Engineering Science JO - Engineering Science SP - 17 EP - 23 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-9279 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20251001.12 AB - Soil acidity has become a major constraint that threatens sustainable agricultural production in highlands of Ethiopia. Liming has been used as a soil amendments, to ameliorate the acidity problem, albeit it was challenging to apply recommended amount at once for small holder farmers due to inadequate availability, high cost, and poor infrastructure for lime transportation to the required agricultural land area. Hence, to address the problems, a new liming strategy and a precision technique referred to as microdosing, which involves application of small, affordable quantities of lime on an acid soil was evaluated across acid soil prone areas of Ethiopia. The objective of this paper was to summarize and document major research achievements recorded so far on different crops responses to lime micro dosing in acid soil prone areas of Ethiopia. Lime microdosing was evaluated at four lime application rates, including 6.25%, 12.5%, 25% and 33.3% of the recommended lime rate based on exchangeable acidity, which was compared to the traditional lime broadcasting strategy using 100% recommended lime rate in different regions of acid soil prone areas of Ethiopia. Averaged across all of the study, lime microdosing with 25% and 33.3% of recommended lime rate resulted in high yield for major crops (wheat, maize, barley, sorghum, fababean and soybean) in study area which was similar to that of the traditional lime broadcast techniques with a 100% recommended lime rate. Hence, the combined results of the study confirmed a promising positive influence of micro-dosing lime in ameliorating soil acidity and enhancing crop yield which could be suggested as a feasible new liming strategy for smallholder farmers seeking cost-effective and sustainable approaches to elevate agricultural productivity on acid soils. Therefore, micro-dose application of 25% recommended lime based on exchangeable acidity at planting time is the most economically affordable for smallholder farmers to improve soil acidity and increase crop production on acid soils of Ethiopia. VL - 10 IS - 1 ER -